but I can't guarantee it's going to continue.

A targets and timetables approach will not work for us.

The text that was adopted recognizes the diversity of approaches.

The United States is opposed to any such discussions.

There's a difference between climate and extreme weather, ... Our scientists continually tell us we cannot blame any single extreme event, attribute that to climate change.

With regard to what the United States is doing on climate change, the actions we have taken are next to none in the world,

We would certainly not agree to the United States being part of legally binding targets and timetable agreement post-2012.

We are working hard on some of the advanced technologies ... but the development and deployment of technology does not fit with rigid targets and timetables.

There are many, many different ideas. People are not yet ready to move ahead under the convention. The Kyoto (members) though, ought to be able to move ahead under the protocol.

We should not start up additional discussions which would confuse our ongoing work.